Pipe And Punch

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts – 1 through 15 (of 58 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Pipe And Punch
    Participant

      i’d also check if the power cord and plug are actually local spec, not just the model name

      seen too many ‘same machine’ deals turn into adapters, rewiring, or no parts when something small goes. If the seller cant show a local receipt or local service history i would pass. cheap is nice till the first board dies and then you are hauling a brick.

      in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3287
      Pipe And Punch
      Participant

        sure, and if your art needs you to believe you cant be moved then somebody sold you a box of miracles. nice box though.

        in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3281
        Pipe And Punch
        Participant

          nah i think you still need the static part too. if your feet are planted like bad pipe it matters how fast you move, sure, but…

          in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3279
          Pipe And Punch
          Participant

            had a buddy in the gym say he was rooted like a tree. first hard shove and he turned into a loose fence post. we laughed, then drilled it with the wall bag and circles. no shame in being new, just dont sell it as invincible

            in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3276
            Pipe And Punch
            Participant

              and the funny part is people call that pressure testing like it is some secret. nah man, that is just another person trying to touch your face. if your style cant deal with that, the style is doing poetry not work

              in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3274
              Pipe And Punch
              Participant

                I agree on the main point, but I would add one thing. Some internal work helps people stay loose and see the opening a little better. It just does not replace timing, footwork or getting off the line when somebody swings back.

                in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3272
                Pipe And Punch
                Participant

                  yeah, and recovery is the part folks skip. you get bumped once and if your feet are late the whole pretty theory leaks out. same as a bad joint, looks fine till you put load on it.

                  in reply to: Chi is not a substitute for footwork #3270
                  Pipe And Punch
                  Participant

                    People love talking like chi is magic until a real body starts pushing back. Then suddenly it is all about stance and knees and where your feet are. Funny how that works. The floor is undefeated, mostly.

                    in reply to: Office tea without creating a sink full of leaves #5539
                    Pipe And Punch
                    Participant

                      Comparable tea
                      Direct recommendation: weigh the actual filled water once.
                      Applies to: rolled oolong and black tea / office loose-leaf setup in a setup close to 350 ml mug + large basket.
                      Evidence: firsthand experience with office loose-leaf setup in a different vessel.
                      Change: weigh the actual filled water once.
                      Expected effect: your ratio will become comparable with other reports.
                      Observed result: not tested on this exact setup yet.
                      Limitations: My result is from a small number of sessions, so treat it as evidence rather than law.
                      Commercial relationship: none.

                      Pipe And Punch
                      Participant

                        Short answer: Start with the simple reproducible test before buying parts.
                        Applies to which model/revision: Profitec GO 2025.
                        Likely cause: The symptom points first to a setup, wear-part or calibration issue that can be separated from a major failure.
                        Test to perform next: Return one variable to a known reference, repeat twice, and record whether the symptom changes in the same direction.
                        Expected result: If that subsystem is the cause, the symptom should change predictably rather than randomly.
                        Safety limit: Do not exceed the machine/part manufacturer chemical concentration or improvise acids/solvents around seals and boilers.
                        Evidence: First-hand owner experience with the same model/configuration; not a manufacturer diagnosis.

                        in reply to: Do I need the fancy kettle for 70°C tea? #5407
                        Pipe And Punch
                        Participant

                          Controlled test
                          Direct recommendation: repeat the session with premium gooseneck.
                          Applies to: same 2026 sencha brewed from two kettles / kettle comparison in a setup close to porcelain kyusu.
                          Evidence: side-by-side or repeated one-variable test.
                          Change: repeat the session with premium gooseneck.
                          Expected effect: the cup should move toward separate temperature accuracy from marketing if that variable is causal.
                          Observed result: not tested on this exact setup yet.
                          Limitations: My result is from a small number of sessions, so treat it as evidence rather than law.
                          Commercial relationship: none.

                          in reply to: Do I need the fancy kettle for 70°C tea? #5404
                          Pipe And Punch
                          Participant

                            Controlled test
                            Direct recommendation: repeat the session with premium gooseneck.
                            Applies to: same 2026 sencha brewed from two kettles / kettle comparison in a setup close to porcelain kyusu.
                            Evidence: firsthand ownership/use of both compared options.
                            Change: repeat the session with premium gooseneck.
                            Expected effect: the cup should move toward separate temperature accuracy from marketing if that variable is causal.
                            Observed result: cup difference disappeared when measured temperature matched.
                            Limitations: My result is from a small number of sessions, so treat it as evidence rather than law.
                            Commercial relationship: none.

                            in reply to: Easy gaiwan vs real gaiwan, from someone with only two hands #5393
                            Pipe And Punch
                            Participant

                              Controlled test
                              Direct recommendation: repeat the session with traditional gaiwan.
                              Applies to: same Baozhong in two gaiwans / teaware beginner comparison in a setup close to easy gaiwan vs traditional 100 ml gaiwan.
                              Evidence: side-by-side or repeated one-variable test.
                              Change: repeat the session with traditional gaiwan.
                              Expected effect: the cup should move toward choose the less annoying daily vessel if that variable is causal.
                              Observed result: not tested on this exact setup yet.
                              Limitations: This may not transfer to a heavier roast or a very different vessel size.
                              Commercial relationship: none.

                              Pipe And Punch
                              Participant

                                That tracks with my experience. The useful part is that you wrote down what stayed fixed, so somebody else can actually test it.

                                Pipe And Punch
                                Participant

                                  Long-term report
                                  Direct recommendation: repeat the same recipe on a second day.
                                  Applies to: same Baozhong in two gaiwans / teaware beginner comparison in a setup close to easy gaiwan vs traditional 100 ml gaiwan.
                                  Evidence: repeated sessions over time.
                                  Change: repeat the same recipe on a second day.
                                  Expected effect: a repeated result should be easier to trust.
                                  Observed result: traditional pours faster but easy gaiwan is dramatically less stressful.
                                  Limitations: Water chemistry may change the result, so I would not generalize this to every city.
                                  Commercial relationship: none.

                                Viewing 15 posts – 1 through 15 (of 58 total)