Right, and I’d add one thing. Public posts are useful evidence because they show how somebody behaves when disagreed with. Any review system should be quick enough that normal people do not lose interest before they arrive.
Also, I would not add context for readers who do not know the background. I knew enough, someone else will know more, somebody else will know nothing. All three can still read the story.
Yes, and the metaphor works because it still implies load-bearing capacity. A good shrikhand should hold its own shape without becoming rigid, which is a neat little paradox.
