- This topic has 27 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 5 days, 22 hours ago by
Briefs And Books.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
September 2, 2026 at 5:12 pm #3938
Reread Etgar Keret’s “Crazy Glue” and I still can’t decide whether the ending is romantic, horrifying, or only funny because it refuses to choose.
What I admire most is how little space it needs. The metaphor becomes literal and somehow that makes it less neat, not more.
Where do people land on it? And does the story work because of the ending, or was it already working before that?
-
September 2, 2026 at 6:03 pm #3939
Romantic, but by maybe half an inch.
It doesn’t fix anything. It just lets them be ridiculous together for one second, which is a different thing
-
September 2, 2026 at 6:41 pm #3940
That is why “romantic” still works for me. Not redemption. Suspension.
The story stops before anyone can convert the moment into a lesson
-
-
September 2, 2026 at 7:26 pm #3941
horror for me lol
funny horror, but still. any marriage that needs industrial adhesive is already into specialist maintenance
-
September 2, 2026 at 8:14 pm #3942
I don’t think the choice is necessary. The joke depends on the two readings remaining available.
Once you decide it is only sweet or only frightening, it becomes a much smaller story.
-
September 2, 2026 at 9:02 pm #3943
Yes. And thankfully he never stops to explain the metaphor to us.
Another paragraph of interpretation would ruin it
-
-
-
September 2, 2026 at 10:37 pm #3944
The point of view matters a great deal to me.
We spend enough time inside his ordinary certainty that when the story becomes impossible, the prose does not need to announce the change. It simply keeps going.
-
September 2, 2026 at 11:21 pm #3945
Exactly. No magical-realism trumpet blast.
The impossible thing gets the same tone as everything else, and that makes it funnier
-
-
September 3, 2026 at 10:18 am #3946
The length is doing a lot too.
Another page and I think the whole thing dies. It needs to leave while the image still has charge
-
September 3, 2026 at 1:17 pm #3949
Does anyone find the last image sentimental?
I did on first reading. On the second, much less. I think I had supplied more reassurance than the story actually gives us.
-
September 3, 2026 at 4:55 pm #3952
The commercial premise has aged strangely well too.
An advertising claim becomes an emotional test, which sounds ridiculous when I write it out and completely normal inside the story.
-
September 3, 2026 at 6:19 pm #3953
And the funniest part is that the sales pitch is treated with more skepticism than the marriage
-
-
September 3, 2026 at 8:04 pm #3954
I also like how little access we get to her interior life.
That could have made her feel thin, but for me it does the opposite. She remains the person he has failed to understand, including at the end.
-
September 3, 2026 at 9:37 pm #3955
Agreed. Explaining her would make the story more balanced in a workshop sense and much worse as a story.
-
-
September 3, 2026 at 11:11 pm #3956
His skepticism is useful because it is so confident.
He keeps treating disbelief as intelligence, right up until disbelief stops being an available position.
-
September 4, 2026 at 12:08 pm #3959
Does anyone think the story is mainly about infidelity?
I don’t. It matters, obviously, but it feels more like pressure in the room than the actual subject.
-
September 4, 2026 at 1:02 pm #3960
Same. If you reduce it to cheating husband gets lesson, the story becomes painfully tidy.
Keret is better than the lesson
-
September 4, 2026 at 2:26 pm #3961
Yes. I think estrangement is closer to it.
Whether surprise can interrupt estrangement is the question I keep hearing underneath the joke.
-
September 4, 2026 at 3:47 pm #3962
Or whether interruption is enough.
The story is smart enough to leave before answering that.
-
-
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.