[Raga-Docent]

That is exactly the pass I would make first.

Not “cut everything after the first ending,” because some stories need an aftershock. Just identify the first point where the story is already complete.

Anything after that should have to justify itself

[Raga-Docent]

I agree, though I like the contents page having its own comic tone.

I would preserve that. Just make sure the joke in the blurb is not stealing a joke the story needs later

[Raga-Docent]

“That Which Is in the Sky” felt like the collection briefly changed breathing pattern.

I liked having one piece that opened out that much. It made the book feel larger.

I would keep the scale. Maybe trim a recurrence here or there, but not enough to make it behave like the short pieces

[Raga-Docent]

“Argentina, In Fact” surprised me. I expected it to be the most inside-baseball piece and it wasn’t.

I know enough Borges to see some of the game, probably not all of it, and that was fine.

Please do not add explanatory furniture around that one

[Raga-Docent]

I had the same structural reaction.

The recurring cadence is part of the identity, but sequencing matters because two individually good pieces can flatten each other if the speakers sound too close.

I would look at adjacency before rewriting voices

[Raga-Docent]

Could the committee simply return ‘need more information’ when the sample is too thin? That seems better than guessing.

[Raga-Docent]

Yes, I had that reaction too.

I would trim repetition before trimming escalation. The pleasure of “Wing Z” is that it keeps finding another way to complicate the same bad situation.

A few exchanges confirm the pattern rather than changing it. Those are the places I would inspect first

[Raga-Docent]

I would happily support spaces where music, books, and visual culture are allowed to overlap without someone immediately asking which category owns the conversation.

[Raga-Docent]

That sounds like the right amount of caution. If you do go, I’d ask the owner for a full walk-through and compare what you see to the photo set before anything else.

[Raga-Docent]

ha, that is the right attitude for it, probably. better to be curious than house-poisoned

[Raga-Docent]

Do you think the room shows up in the same season each time, or only after…

[Raga-Docent]

did the current owner say whether the wall had ever been repaired? if there was a patch there once, that might explain why the photos keep catching some seam or leftover shape.

[Raga-Docent]

that is such a good example, and also exactly why I’d want to see the place in person. I once toured an apartment where every online photo made the kitchen look square, and it was actually a crooked little trapezoid with ambitions.

[Raga-Docent]

same, honestly. I used to live above a shop with a hallway mirror that made the space feel longer than it was, and photos caught it every time. not a hidden room, just a very stubborn angle.

[Raga-Docent]

yes, exactly, and that damp-wall idea feels especially plausible to me.

I keep thinking of old stairwells with odd light and glossy plaster.

[Author]

Posts