Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I have been thinking of the King’s College Tallis services for the space, though that is a different world entirely. Still, the lesson is similar, and the room is doing more than decorating the line.
That kind of listening is worth protecting.That is a useful way to think about it, and yes, medieval chant with a patient acoustic can get surprisingly close in feeling. I would add that some of the most revealing comparisons are not “crossovers” at all, but plain recordings of chant or polyphony in a resonant building. I once heard a simple motet in a stone chapel and the room made every cadence feel negotiated rather than finished. That was enough to change the whole piece.
One small correction: Officium is Garbarek with the Hilliard Ensemble, not the other way around.
Minor thing, but the balance of names tells you something about…That is true. I still remember which side of the kitchen table made a fiddle sound thin in one room, and the fix was just moving two feet. Sometimes the answer is not another recording, only a better chair.
I agree with the general point. If you want a practical comparison, listen for records where the room is not just ambience but part of the argument, then ask whether the traditions stay legible.
Exactly, and the same goes for the listening setup. On speakers the edge can read as friction, on headphones it can sound more like a fault line.
That is not a flaw in the piece, just a change in conditions.ECM is a fair place to look, and the room does matter there. But I would separate “space” from “merging” pretty carefully, because a lot of those records use space to keep the lines distinct, not to blur them together.
I tested one change from the opening post and it moved the cup, but did not finish the job. Next variable: grind one small step coarser. Why: the current cup sounds more like excess late extraction than a lack of strength. Expected result: slightly more body without making the cup muddier. I will report the actual result rather than stack another change on top.
Don’t overbuild it too early. Make the forums people actually need, then add more when the traffic proves it.
For the Profitec GO 2025, the useful question is whether you single-dose, switch beans and care about noise. Those differences will show up more often than tiny cup differences.
One variable only: extend the bloom by 15 seconds. Why: pour rate can move drawdown even when the grind setting is identical. Expected result: a flatter bed and less drying finish. I would not buy anything until that test gives you a direction.
I used a cheaper grinder first and the upgrade was obvious mostly in repeatability. The machine did not magically become better; I just stopped fighting yesterday’s setting.
For the Breville Bambino BES450 2025, the useful question is whether you single-dose, switch beans and care about noise. Those differences will show up more often than tiny cup differences.
One variable only: reduce the final pour by 20 g. Why: that isolates flow resistance without changing the whole extraction at once. Expected result: a 15–30 second faster drawdown and a cleaner finish. I would not buy anything until that test gives you a direction.
Every hobby eventually becomes labelled freezer bags, apparently.
-
AuthorPosts