[Pastry]

Yes, this is exactly the distinction I was wondering about.

“Take off the raw edge” and “brown” are two very different instructions in my head. Good to know I am not simply losing a fight with onions.

[Pastry]

I would also say the book is less whimsical than people remember because the joke lands on the vulnerable, not the powerful. The weirdness is not decoration, it is the method.
That is why the ending feels political to me even when it is dreamlike

[Pastry]

and the book never pretends bodies are invisible. it keeps dragging them back into the room

[Pastry]

A better chair is almost worse because it invites gratitude. very efficient trap

[Pastry]

I mean the drawer as part of the system, not a treasure chest. The hidden space matters because it is still built into the furniture, not outside it.

[Pastry]

I disagree a little on the procedural part, only because Carrington seems to slip the machinery out from under us on purpose. The book is interested in rules but it also likes the dream logic that makes rules look ridiculous, so I do not think it settles for administration alone.
Still, your point about who decides is the sharpest practical question in the whole ending

[Pastry]

Yes, exactly, same lock different paint and everyone applauds the decor. which is basically civilization in a sentence

[Pastry]

i had a great aunt like that, stubborn as hell, and nobody managed her nicely either

[Pastry]

That sort of example sticks, because it is so ordinary. The real horror is rarely gothic, just a schedule and a door that opens for someone else first.

[Pastry]

I keep thinking the book is cruel in a useful way about age. Not sentimental at all, just honest about bodies being managed and talked over.
That makes the ending feel less like heaven and more like a switch in the machinery

[Pastry]

Warmly, I lean the same way. The last movement feels like Carrington saying the rules of the room have changed, not that the room vanished.

Which is a better joke anyway. The floor still there, just renamed.

[Pastry]

Yes, and the politeness is part of the violence. Everyone can act civilized while the old women are still being sorted, handled, stored, all that nonsense. The ending keeps that pressure, I think, because it never lets the reader pretend the world outside is morally cleaner.
It just has better curtains maybe

[Pastry]

Yes exactly, and the paint job is often what people admire first so they stop noticing the latch. In Carrington the absurd surface is doing real work, it distracts you just long enough to show the structure underneath. I think that is why the ending stays funny and uneasy at once not one or the other

[Pastry]

I would say different enclosure, honestly. The book is too rude about institutions to give a neat exit, and the fantasy comes in sideways, not like a magic key. maybe the point is that freedom still has furniture in it

[Pastry]

I think the door image is useful, but maybe not the same door every time. Carrington seems to enjoy when a room becomes a trap and then a joke and then a trap again.

That is why I would hesitate to call the ending clean liberation. It feels like movement, yes, but not necessarily progress.

[Author]

Posts