Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Read it with a marker for every repeated gesture. It gets funny in a sad way.
Try rereading the last pages right after the diary sections. That contrast makes the choice feel much less abstract.
yes exactly, but the loop is doing a lot of work there. It is not just repetition, it is repetition with no reciprocal answer, which is…
I had a summer job where I learned regulars by their gestures before their names. One man always tapped the counter twice before ordering coffee and I swear I knew he was late before he said a word. Not the same thing, of course. But the book made me think about how fast we build a person from small repeats and then call it knowledge.
I think the social ritual part is exactly the trap. He learns the group by observing their habits, like a waiter reading a table before speaking, and then he mistakes that reading for access to them. The final choice can be love, yes, but also a very stubborn refusal to accept that some people are only there as images. That is the nasty little heartbreak of the book, no?
yes, exactly, and once you see that you cant unsee it. a shared table can still be cruel if one chair is always assumed
ha, yes. if he were perfectly humble i think the book would be much duller, and maybe less true
yes, and then the small thing becomes proof you are trustworthy or not. petty, but very…
paperwork of the soul is very funny, unfortunately true. ive seen enough service jobs to know the mood
I like the idea, but I think the novel is also about access, not only promise and refuse. who can enter a room, take a thing…
The bit where he has to borrow what he needs, that stayed with me. even a pencil can feel political there
annoyingly good detail
I disagree a little, because the political part is never just backdrop to me.
The rooms…yes, exactly. i kept thinking of a bad dinner party where everyone is being noble and nobody is allowed to say they are hungry. sounds petty, but it is not really
I always get stuck on the marriage part, honestly. It feels like the book keeps asking whether intimacy can exist without ownership, or if that is just a nice lie people tell themselves. What compromise hit you hardest, the personal one or the civic one?
I hope it stays a place where people can be enthusiastic without becoming missionaries. That would already put us ahead of many hobbies.
-
AuthorPosts