Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I think we have it. Three rotating volunteers, public material supplied by the applicant, behavior rather than opinions, two of three to approve, and an alternate short conversation when there is no useful public history. I am naming this the Welcoming Committee of Three Veterans, against my better judgment.
All right, the three-person review idea is clearly collecting the most furniture around it. Keep pulling at the weak points, especially privacy and what we do with applicants who have no public posting history.
Useful distinction: I do not want us judging whether somebody is interesting enough. We are screening for whether they can coexist with other people, which is a much lower and more merciful bar.
Please keep chronological view somewhere even if ranked answers happen later. Sometimes the order of failed experiments is the whole story.
I support the labels. “Inference” will save us a lot of fake certainty.
The one-variable rule should probably be repeated in large letters. People love changing temperature, leaf, time and water and then announcing the kettle fixed it.
The water rule is good. Please do not make conductivity meters a citizenship requirement. City plus filtered/unfiltered is already much better than nothing.
July 5, 2026 at 2:54 am in reply to: Rules & regulations: how to format a topic without making everyone guess #4026List the exact revision, voltage and exorcist. We will take it from there.
July 5, 2026 at 1:56 am in reply to: Rules & regulations: log the brew before diagnosing the universe #4600Agreed in principle. For now, the questioner can say what they tested in plain text. We can add machinery when the machinery solves a demonstrated problem.
July 5, 2026 at 12:48 am in reply to: Rules & regulations: how to format a topic without making everyone guess #4024Strongly encouraged, not mandatory. Sometimes the useful evidence is a serial label, pressure reading or ten-second sound clip. The rule is reduce guessing, not upload media for ceremony.
July 4, 2026 at 11:22 pm in reply to: Rules & regulations: log the brew before diagnosing the universe #4598Yes. ‘Grind finer’ is allowed. ‘Grind finer because X, and expect Y’ is useful. The second one gets priority.
July 4, 2026 at 9:48 pm in reply to: Rules & regulations: how to format a topic without making everyone guess #4022Agreed in principle, postponed in implementation. For now the questioner should return and write “Confirmed solution:” so the resolution is searchable without adding another plugin/state system.
July 4, 2026 at 7:42 pm in reply to: Rules & regulations: how to format a topic without making everyone guess #4020Yes. That one is active now, not postponed. Safety devices stay safety devices.
July 4, 2026 at 7:25 pm in reply to: Rules & regulations: log the brew before diagnosing the universe #4595Good idea, postponed. Some roasters will earn enough traffic for that; others would become empty monuments with one heroic post from 2024.
July 4, 2026 at 4:06 pm in reply to: Rules & regulations: how to format a topic without making everyone guess #4017Also postponed. I want the model name somewhere in the title, but I do not want seventy threads beginning with the same machine name like a spare-parts catalogue. Human titles are allowed.
-
AuthorPosts