Home › Forums › coffee? Tea? › loose-leaf tea stuff › First-flush Darjeeling without the punishment phase
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 2 weeks ago by
Lentil-Seamstress.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
July 28, 2026 at 10:03 pm #5260Question or objective: a repeatable breakfast-size pot
Tea category: Darjeeling black tea
Exact product: Hill Window 2026 first flush
Vendor: Mountain Letter Tea
Origin: Darjeeling, India
Cultivar, if known: AV2 dominant lot
Harvest season/year: spring 2026
Processing or roast: lightly oxidized first-flush black tea
Cake/batch number, if relevant: cake/lot noted above where applicable; otherwise N/A
Purchase/opening date: purchased 2026-05-15; opened 2026-07-21
Storage since purchase: sealed original pouch inside a dark cupboard
Style: Western
Vessel: porcelain pot
Vessel material: porcelain
Nominal and actual filled capacity: 450 ml nominal / 400 ml filled
Filter or strainer: basket infuser
Kettle: standard electric kettle + thermometer
Vessel preheated: yes
Dry leaf weight: 5.0 g
Water volume: 400 ml
Water temperature: 88°C
Water source or mineral profile: filtered tap water, 60 ppm
Rinse: 5-10 s where noted by the recipe; otherwise none
Infusion schedule: 3:00
Agitation: none
Was each infusion completely decanted?: yes
Aroma: muscatel and flowers
Sweetness: medium-high
Bitterness: low
Astringency: medium
Body/texture: light-medium
Flavour: grape skin, flowers, citrus
Aftertaste: long floral
Number of satisfying infusions: 1
Exact problem: recipe aimed at avoiding bitterness while retaining fragrance
Desired result: a repeatable breakfast-size pot
Variable changed: temperature
Previous value: 95°C
New value: 88°C
Result: much less bitter and the fragrance stayed intact
Dry-leaf photograph: not attached yet
Liquor photograph: available in the author’s notes; not embedded in this archive
Wet-leaf photograph: not attached yet
Video if pouring or drainage is relevant: pour/drainage video described in the post; not embedded in this archiveThis is the first version of this recipe I have repeated enough times to stop calling it an accident. The useful change was temperature: 95°C to 88°C. much less bitter and the fragrance stayed intact.
I am posting the taste result as well as the instructions because a recipe that only says what to do is half a recipe. If you try it, please say what changed in the cup rather than just whether you liked it.
-
July 28, 2026 at 11:00 pm #5261
Same tea/batch
Direct recommendation: repeat the session with 88°C.
Applies to: Hill Window 2026 first flush / Darjeeling black tea in a setup close to porcelain pot.
Evidence: firsthand use of the same Hill Window 2026 first flush in a closely matched setup.
Change: repeat the session with 88°C.
Expected effect: the cup should move toward a repeatable breakfast-size pot if that variable is causal.
Observed result: not tested on this exact setup yet.
Limitations: This may not transfer to a heavier roast or a very different vessel size.
Commercial relationship: none.-
July 29, 2026 at 1:44 am #5263
Long-term report
Direct recommendation: weigh the actual filled water once.
Applies to: Hill Window 2026 first flush / Darjeeling black tea in a setup close to porcelain pot.
Evidence: repeated sessions over time.
Change: weigh the actual filled water once.
Expected effect: your ratio will become comparable with other reports.
Observed result: much less bitter and the fragrance stayed intact.
Limitations: My result is from a small number of sessions, so treat it as evidence rather than law.
Commercial relationship: none.
-
-
July 29, 2026 at 12:11 am #5262
Controlled test
Direct recommendation: repeat the same recipe on a second day.
Applies to: Hill Window 2026 first flush / Darjeeling black tea in a setup close to porcelain pot.
Evidence: side-by-side or repeated one-variable test.
Change: repeat the same recipe on a second day.
Expected effect: a repeated result should be easier to trust.
Observed result: not tested on this exact setup yet.
Limitations: Water chemistry may change the result, so I would not generalize this to every city.
Commercial relationship: none.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.